Wednesday, April 18, 2007

The whole Imus thing

It has been awhile since I spent much time watching the news, at least on a so-called real news channel, not with John Stewart still on every night at 11. But I figured it had been way too long, like over 24 hours, since I had heard of any soldiers dying in Iraq or some stupid comments from the White House, so I tuned in. And while there were no dead bodies to show, there was what looked like a breathing cadaver plastered on every channel in the form of Don Imus, who apparently had said something that someone heard and then told someone who emailed some black female basketball player at Rutgers. That had to be what happened, since the odds of a 20 year old intelligent hard working African-american athlete at Rutgers even having a clue who Don Imus is are about the same as his wife marrying him for his looks. As I hear the details of this complete stupidity, I am forced to contemplate the most obvious question. Who the hell cares what Don Imus says? Are these girls really upset with what was said, or just pissed off at the 3, 285,058 members of the god-forsaken media that keep pounding them with questions every 3 seconds? There is no excuse for the idiotic comments in the first place, but it this really the first time it has happened? Imus has done this for years. Now we all care? The phrase that was used was “nappy-headed ho’s.” So as I see it, there are 2 groups that have any rights to be offended: first, the Rutgers women basketball team and their families; and second, actual nappy headed ho’s. And I am not really sure if the latter would speak up anyway. Instead of hearing from either of these groups, we get to hear the Reverends’ Sharpton and Jackson, both with those spotless records, yelling some insanity at every possible moment a camera is in front of them. I wonder, How much time did they spend talking with the young women before their respective public tirades? What gives them the right to demand the head of Imus, when these girls had not yet said a word? Did they realize that these comments, while incomprehensible, came from a man that has raised millions for children of every race imaginable? Not only did they ramble on like madmen, but looked even worse following the Rutgers press conference. Who needs the Rev’s as a voice of the African-american nation when you have C. Vivian Stringer and Essence Carson handling themselves with more grace and class than those two men have ever shown. In the face of an insane media outcry and a ridiculous amount of unwanted publicity, these 2 women stood out as examples of what all humans should be. Did all of this attention bother them? Of course. Would they rather have had the focus be on their remarkable tournament run, and their individual accomplishments as African American women? Absolutely. Did they wallow in self-pity because some idiot opened his mouth? Never. There was no question after that news conference that anything ever said about them could slow them down, no matter how popular the source. These women don’t need anyone to stand up for them, especially some media hungry self-appointed spokesmen. This is the most over-blown non-story in years, destroying the career of man that does far more good than harm, and putting amazing women in a completely unwarranted pressure filled mess. I don’t respect a black man for being black, I don’t respect a white man for being white. I respect those that work hard, have self-respect, and don’t let anything stand in the way of greatness. I respect the Rutgers womens basketball team.

8 comments:

Unknown said...

I have yet to comment on the whole Imus situation in writing, although I have voiced my opinion privately. Being an "African American" woman I took offense to Imus' use of words. No this isn't the first time I've heard it used although be it the first time I've heard it from a white man. My personal feelings about Imus being fired? My boss asked me the day Imus was fired what I thought and I told him I did not think what he said should have warranted him being fired. Reprimanded yes but fired no. He was surprised by my answer to say the least but like I explained to him black people have said worse to each other and the whole controversy was fire stormed by big mouth Al Sharpton and Jessie Jackson, harping on the fact that a "white" Imus used the words nappy headed ho's that belonged exclusively to the black community!!!! How dare a white man use derogatory language against our black women! Only black men are entitled to that glory! Jesus! I have to laugh at the whole thing. I don't care for Imus and never have but the man should get his job back and the black community needs to stop throwing stones because the garbage in our own backyard stinks to the high heavens!

Mind of Len said...

My comment on the Imus mess may be found on my blog. http://mindoflen.blogspot.com/2007/04/justice-justice-shall-you-pursue.html
Please read some of the rest of my posts. You'll find what you are looking for. Len
mindoflen.blogspot.com

RuthieWorld said...

What Imus said comes down to the issue of freeedom of speech. A person can call another person out of their name all day long, that's their right. We would like to think most human beings have the couth not to say things and call people names that they know will be hurtful and cause a backlash. Things like racial slurs and derogatory remarks reminds us all that in the 21st century the race issue still has not been resolved in America or the world for that matter-it's living large like WEB Dubois predicted it still would be nearly 50 years ago.

Sling said...

We wouldn't have this problem if Rutgers women basketball team had straighter hair and was less promiscuous.

Hmmm Government Cheese said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Hmmm Government Cheese said...

Imus is but one more gem in the crown of the great oppressor political correctness. This tyrant has been squashing free speech and independent thought in the American workplace for the better part of twenty years and has been quietly trying to conquer mass media for the last decade.

Opinions are like assholes, everyone has one and most of the time the people around you will think the stink.

Whether you dabble in Darwinism or place your eternal salvation in a creationist model of the universe, where we come to a common ground is we can all agree that Humans are blessed with the gift of independent and abstract thought.

This unique gift has allowed us to imagine the future, wallow in our own inevitable mortality and allowed us to outsmart the mastodons to become top of the food chain. It also makes us question the world around us and express what's rattling around in our brain pans.

Why do we continue to suppress the one thing that makes us so unique? Those that do have the hutzpah to speak their mind are branded controversial, trouble maker, eccentric. No! These people are human and should feel free to express whatever their gray matter conjures up.

Do we need rules to live by for society to work? Yes. Thou shall not kill is a good one for example. Please tell me the last time someone was literally killed by a word though. What are we being protected from? Yes, words could cause psychological damage that will lead to suicidal tendencies later, but the point is the words don’t kill directly. All that words can do is offend. And maybe I’m offended by the fact that so many people are offended so easily. Does that mean they should stop being offended because it bothers me?

See how silly it is when we try to place rules on emotion and govern thought with policy? The end result is a world of lobotomized drones fumbling towards infinity with the slightest bit of spittle hanging from our lips.

governmentcheese@hushmail.com

faye said...

okay, the imus thing is over and has been beat to death. however, somehow the ugly head is raised again when isaiah washington gets fired for calling a gay guy "gay", i think that's what he said, right? okay, i heard it was a gay slur--however, he was made to, and did, attone for it in "every way humanly possible" save for kissing the gay actor's butt. seriously, why did he have to do public service announcements, go to classes to learn how to be nice to gay people and the like?? Imus did apologize, and that was about it, and last i heard he was gonna sue the station for firing him for breach of contract--duh? Point: Imus still thinks he didn't do anything wrong and say any ignorant thing he likes and get "paid". Poor Isaiah worked his butt off to keep his job and make nice with everyone and was simply lied to and fired. What's the difference between Isaiah's remarks and Imus--Isaiah paid dearly for his and made the proper attonement and still got jacked up. Imus is a rich and insincere asshole that thinks he was right and wants to be paid for calling the athletes names.... i digress...

Critique and Write said...

Don Imus' comments, racist and sexiest at times, propelled him
into popularly since arriving in
New York. His drug and alcohol
abuse never dented his fame.
Although, there were utterances
of not tuning in to his radio
show.
It can be no denying Imus'
radiothon raised over fifty-
million dollars, helping
Tomorrows Children Fund, CJ
Foundation For Sids, and Imus
Ranch for kids with cancer.
However, there is a risk one
takes when using insults as a
joke, especially when in the public's eye.
The remark about the Rutgers
team was not palpable for society.